Okay, I'm taking an off-day on a Monday this week. My legs still feel pretty beat after yesterday's long-ish bike ride. Only 50 miles, but it's the first time of the new year that I've gone up to 50 so far. That pales in comparison to the 70-80 I crank out on a Sunday once the season gets rolling, but it's only the middle of March. Not to mention that all of my other rides that have been over 40 have been with someone else so there was either some working together going on or some slower paces. Yesterday was by myself so I had to deal with my usual "go hard all the time" mentality. I'm still recovering.
Did anyone notice that I'm writing for my second consecutive week on the off-day? Excited.
So the good news first.
Kayla and I are getting a car! That's nearly as exciting as my two-week blog streak. It's an '02 Nissan Altima from a family member of Kayla. Among other things, this means that I'll be able to fill out the schedule portion of the blog page soon as I register for races. I'll still pretty much be doing most of my racing in the Pennsylvania/Ohio/West Virginia area, but I'll no longer have to rely on anyone else to get to races.
The not so good news.
I suppose it's not really bad news, but having to buy the car results in me not being able to entertain the possibility of buying a disc wheel for the season. I'm greatly lamenting that fact, but having a car is a necessity for racing and a disc wheel isn't. Now I just have to drop by Dirty Harry's and have my rear Flash Point hub serviced and I'll be rolling with them again. I can't believe this will be my third year racing with them. It seems like only last year that I started all this biking stuff.
It's an unfortunate reality that, if I want to get a pro license, I need a car. A disc wheel might help if the only thing keeping me from getting one is an extra minute in my bike split, but something tells me that the need to go to bigger races is more important than that.
Love/Hate Part 2.
So last week I talked about the
laughable practices of WTC's management of the Ironman brand including the lack of money in the sport and the direction in which it is headed.
This week, I'll extend the notion that WTC has a responsibility to the entire sport (not just the Ironman distance) because, as I said before, the popularity of all distances of triathlon in America lives and dies by the popularity of Ironman. I will do this by talking about:
The Average Ironman Athlete
I realize that by somewhat ripping on the average age-grouper, I'm opening a huge can of worms. Afterall, isn't it the entry fees of these age-groupers that ultimately pay the prize purse for the pros? Well, yes, but the prize purse has stayed the same or gone down for the past ten or fifteen years while the age-group field and the entry fees have gone up, so someone is just plain mismanaging the money. Though, I'm confused as to how cycling can afford to pay riders at least a living wage for even the most average domestic pro and there is no age-group base in the sport. There are ranks of pros just like baseball or hockey and that's it. WTC has turned their business into a solely-for-profit venture by exploiting the type and class of people who can afford to pursue the sport on a recreational basis, thereby ignoring their inherent responsibility to the rest of the sport. This is made evident by the most reviled division of an Ironman race: The CEO challenge.
Seriously? The CEO challenge? Fifty-year-old CEOs are honestly so bored with their time and money that they have to have a competition with other bored CEOs to see who can get into the best shape? Jokes.
I raced at the inaugural edition of the Providence 70.3 in Rhode Island last summer. In our race packets was a program about the race and about Ironman. It included a profile of "The Average Ironman Athlete" complete with age, weight, IM times and even average income, which turned out to be $160,000 per year. Does anyone realistically think that if the average income was $50,000 per year, the entry fee for Ironman races would still be $500? It's probably the same reason that bikes cost $5,000 and wheels cost $2,000. There's a bit of a vibe in this sport that, no matter the finishing time, he with the newest, most expensive gear wins. I've never been a class warrior, but if you think that money doesn't make some things a lot easier, you're kidding yourself.
And then there is the coverage of Ironman races, particularly the world championships in Kona, that focuses on the sixty-year-old mom with five kids who still finds the time to train, the guy with cancer who is competing in an Ironman as one of his lifelong wishes and the guy who had both legs blown off in Iraq or Afghanistan and is still doing it. First of all, let me make it clear that these people are insane examples of time management and heartbreaking courage to prove that anything is possible no matter the hand you're dealt. They deserve the attention they get because they show anyone watching at home what is possible. But there is such emphasis on these stories that the fact that triathlon is a legit sport with legit pros is lost on the general public. It is no wonder that there are so many people who get into this sport to climb their Everest and prove to themselves that they can do it; that is image of the sport that is marketed to them. To them, that is what the sport is for.
It is true that this sport is so much more popular in other countries like Germany, Australia, New Zealand or Portugal than it is in the United States, but as is the case with other things, the U.S. has the influence to direct the world's attention one way or another if for no other reason than its sheer size. Right now, it is directing attention to the inspirational stories of the common person achieving an Ironman finish.
I believe it is also true that the athlete base in other countries is so much more competitive as well because of how they conduct their races. If you race in another country, there are often only three awards given out; first place, second place and third place. Maybe this goes down to five, but that's the most. If you race in the U.S., awards go to the top three or top five overall, the top three in each age group, the top three clydesdales, the top three athenas, the top three CEOs and the top three of whatever else the organization has come up with to make people feel better about themselves for completing a sprint race.
Other countries focus a lot more on Olympic races that they hope would ultimately benefit the country itself in the Olympics. Whether you think that is right or wrong is beside the point. They have comprehensive development programs that harvest talent at a young age. Vanessa Fernandez (Portugal) for instance is something insane like 20-years-old and wins most world cup races she enters. You can bet she was picked out by her country's triathlon federation years ago and is given everything she needs to become a better athlete. There are no part-time jobs involved to make ends meet like there are for developing Olympic athletes in the States. For other countries, triathlon is a sport; here it is a spectacle.
But I digress. If this post gets much longer, I might fall asleep!
Training is going well. I'm trying to pick up my running again and work in more distance on the swim. My first race is potentially in about six weeks so I need to get things in gear. Hopefully I'll update further next day off.
On a side note, Wednesday is my birthday! Feel free to leave a birthday wish comment or to find out where to send disc wheels as gifts :-)
Cheers!