Beginning of the week went pretty well, so fast forward to Friday's 20-mile run. First of all, it ended up at 18 miles instead. I was getting really close to home and, because of where my house is situated in the city, anywhere I would have run to go farther would have taken me uphill. I was getting pretty beat so I called it at 18. Once again, I consider the run a success, doing it in about 2:05 with no food or drink.
This spring in Boston, my race started to quickly unravel about mile 18. My time checks had me at the 30k (18.6 miles) mark in 2:12. Imagine if I was still running anything close to a reasonable pace and I would cover the next 10k in about 45 minutes, adding up to 2:57. True, that after the closing 2k, that would put me past three hours, but still at a PR by a few minutes. That means my 18 in 2:05 on nothing seems pretty favorable to me.
Saturday was even more exciting and solidified my confidence that I could have a shot of getting three hours in Harrisburg. I knew I had to get up and run. I knew it would hurt, but I knew I had to do it because it would mean a lot to me mentally toughening up for the race. I was definitely really tight running up the half-mile slight grade out to one of the main roads by my house. I decided that I would use the "pace" function on my watch for the first time just to track my mile splits and make sure that it would work the way I was expecting for the marathon. I hit the split button at mile 1 and the elapsed time was 6:53! I was pretty surprised by this because the last thing I was thinking about was pushing the pace at all. My main focus was just to run a few miles and maintain good form at all costs. The next mile's terrain was a little bit more favorable and went by in 6:47! I couldn't believe it. The next two splits were something like 6:58 and 6:48. A little erratic, but I'm pretty sure it was because of the elevation profile of the route that I did. I did about another 3/4 of a mile in good time and my average pace for the run worked out to 6:51/mile. So all seems to be in place for a decent run at my goal in two weeks from yesterday.
On a side note, I went over to Mapple's last night to install my brand-new Dura-ace cranks on my TTX! They're so super-sweet and I'm taking them on their maiden voyage this afternoon.
A few thoughts on running. So I read an interesting thread on the Slowtwitch forum yesterday that make me think more about running with what you have as opposed to trying to change your body to run with some sort of "ideal" running form. Here's the quick version: First off, slowtwitch is a triathlon news site with a forum that's always good for some controversial issues. The first post is by a pro training with Team TBB and Bret Sutton. Sutton's training methods are responsible for taking amateurs with a lot of talent but not much else and turning them into dominant professionals. Examples would be Chrissie Wellington, Belinda Granger and a handful of others. His methods are much discussed, praised and criticized because they defy conventional and scientific methods that have been all but accepted as the standard. Sutton is known to think about things in such a practical way and come up with reasons why everyone else is wrong and exploit them. For instance, he doesn't have his athletes wear aero helmets because, although they may be "faster" on the bike, they can often cause the wearer to overheat and consequently suffer in the run portion of the race, especially in iron-distance races.
In any case, this woman in question was trying to change her running form to land more on the mid-or-fore-foot instead of heel-striking because it is "supposed" to be faster and more economical. And indeed, this would seem to be the case. Land on the middle or front part of your foot and there is less resistance to overcome to start your next stride, allowing you to spend less energy for each step. Initially this seems to make sense. However, this woman began to experience some shin pain (possibly shin splints) and couldn't run for very long before the pain was too great. Sutton advised her to go back to her natural heel-striking form and his reasons seem to be just as well.
It seems logical to believe, as Sutton believes, that it would be detrimental to try to change the running form of a person who has either not been running or running a certain way for years and years. Their body is already set in its physiology. To make a long story slightly less so, she went back to heel-striking and her shin pain is receding dramatically.
Which brings me to my own experiences with this phenomenon. I also frequently attempt to alter my stride a little in hopes of becoming a more efficient runner and have noticed that, after one pretty long session in particular, I definitely had some pain in my right shin; something that I have never experienced before. Needless to say, I think I have gone back to just trying to run efficiently as my body will allow.
My brother, who is 26 and just really started to run this summer, has had to go to the doctor to assess some pretty severe shin pain himself. Unfortunately, he has found out that he basically has a lot of borderline stress fractures beginning and has to take 6-8 weeks off of running. He has done a lot of research before really diving into running, so I'm sure, as we have also talked on the phone about it, that he is aware of the popular belief that it's better to land on the front part of your foot. This make me wonder if this is a contributor to his pain. Just some thoughts that I think are worth considering for anyone biting on this theory. Of course, there are plenty of people who have a naturally beautiful stride and it is amazing to watch them run, but it is also certainly not a prerequisite of successful running.
Alas, I digress.
Marathon in 13 days. Be there!
Cheers!

